<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AceHTML Freeware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.isoftwarereviews.com/acehtml-freeware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.isoftwarereviews.com/acehtml-freeware/</link>
	<description>Software Review Rating Voting Tips...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:02:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.isoftwarereviews.com/acehtml-freeware/comment-page-1/#comment-127840</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 05:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isoftwarereviews.com/acehtml-freeware/#comment-127840</guid>
		<description>I need to make a correction to my previous post about ACEHtml. They do have local host preview with their internal browser for PHP scripts, what I meant to say was that it previews as a temp file in their browser, so you have to go to an external browser and preview it in http://localhost/Foldername/Filename.php to execute a dynamic script for sending information from one page to another.
In all other respects, ACE is still tops as a webcoder, sorry for the misinformation,
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to make a correction to my previous post about ACEHtml. They do have local host preview with their internal browser for PHP scripts, what I meant to say was that it previews as a temp file in their browser, so you have to go to an external browser and preview it in <a href="http://localhost/Foldername/Filename.php" rel="nofollow">http://localhost/Foldername/Filename.php</a> to execute a dynamic script for sending information from one page to another.<br />
In all other respects, ACE is still tops as a webcoder, sorry for the misinformation,<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.isoftwarereviews.com/acehtml-freeware/comment-page-1/#comment-127814</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 07:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isoftwarereviews.com/acehtml-freeware/#comment-127814</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using ACEHtml for many years. It feels like an old friend now, or an old huntin&#039; dog that you still love, even if his best huntin&#039; days are over. No other code editor ever came within a mile of ACE, not even close. It hasn&#039;t really changed much over the past decade; basically for HTML coders it doesn&#039;t get much better: Full right click tag editing, probably the very best frames and table wizards I have ever come across, possibly even better than Dreamweaver&#039;s; good internal preview (make sure you uncheck &quot;full refresh of browser&quot; in preferences to return to the same spot in a long web page when refreshing); it has a great file browser where you can actually preview webpages before opening them, same with the image browser; a full PHP, SQL, and javascript library in the paid version; PHP parser to preview scripts (unfortunately not in local host, so you have to preview in a browser to execute a dynamic script);.tons of free DHTML and Javascripts.
With all their great features I wish they would have upgraded it more with a WYSIWYG option
and more extras and given Dreamweaver a run for their money. They sure made a great start, and with the paid version they had some beautiful templates, if only they would have kept developing it, if only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using ACEHtml for many years. It feels like an old friend now, or an old huntin&#8217; dog that you still love, even if his best huntin&#8217; days are over. No other code editor ever came within a mile of ACE, not even close. It hasn&#8217;t really changed much over the past decade; basically for HTML coders it doesn&#8217;t get much better: Full right click tag editing, probably the very best frames and table wizards I have ever come across, possibly even better than Dreamweaver&#8217;s; good internal preview (make sure you uncheck &#8220;full refresh of browser&#8221; in preferences to return to the same spot in a long web page when refreshing); it has a great file browser where you can actually preview webpages before opening them, same with the image browser; a full PHP, SQL, and javascript library in the paid version; PHP parser to preview scripts (unfortunately not in local host, so you have to preview in a browser to execute a dynamic script);.tons of free DHTML and Javascripts.<br />
With all their great features I wish they would have upgraded it more with a WYSIWYG option<br />
and more extras and given Dreamweaver a run for their money. They sure made a great start, and with the paid version they had some beautiful templates, if only they would have kept developing it, if only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

